A clearer view of dispute economics

See the whole
shape of a dispute.

A considered way for litigation teams to compare fees, funding and insurance arrangements and their effect on the financial picture of a commercial claim.

Explore the illustrative preview

Built for thoughtful conversations—not predictions.

01 / 03

One case.
Different economics.

Fee, funding and insurance arrangements are rarely simple to compare. Each has its own moving parts, and the consequences can change across settlement, trial and recovery scenarios.

Mattersum brings those parts into one considered view—so lawyers and their clients can examine the differences, test assumptions and ask better questions.

Take a look around ↘
A

Edit proposal terms independently

Choose a supported structure for each option, then edit its proposal terms independently.

B

Make assumptions visible

Work from a shared set of matter assumptions, then explore how they influence each view.

C

Follow the money through

See recovery scenarios and an itemised waterfall, with versions and changes kept in view.

Compare the shape,
not just the headline.

A small glimpse of how a matter might be laid out. Change the scenario to explore the labels; displayed amounts are placeholders and do not recalculate.

MATTERS / ILLUSTRATION

Northstar Components Ltd

Draft analysis
Commercial claim · Updated just nowSAMPLE MATTER
RECOVERY SCENARIOSettlement
PROPOSALSTRUCTUREILLUSTRATIVE NET
Option oneHourly£—↗
Option twoCFA · ATE£—↗
Option threeCFA · Funding · ATE£—↗
Option fourDBA · ATE£—↗
≋
Follow each recovery throughItemised waterfall · assumptions · version history
↗

! This is a static, illustrative interface preview. It contains no matter data, calculations or financial outcomes. Mattersum is an explanatory prototype, not legal or financial advice and does not predict case outcomes.

M+

A more considered comparison

Make room for
the whole picture.

Return to the preview ↑